Pages

11.16.2012

A Review: A Study in Scarlet by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


I initially picked up A Study in Scarlet to work towards my 50 titles pledge for Classics Club, but also used it to help me complete my goal of Peril the First for the RIP VII Challenge. I was ashamed to admit that I had never experienced Sherlock in literary form and thought it had been long enough.

Sherlock Holmes is called to the scene when I man is found dead in an abandoned home. His body, left without wounds that imply violence, is sprawled beneath the word rache (or revenge in German) painted in blood on the wall. Watson, Holmes's new roommate, is along for the ride and relates the situation as it unfolds.

I had mixed feelings about this one. While I can definitely say that Doyle is a talented writer and certainly had the smarts to invent such a character, I found the sudden change in narrative and the long, detailed excerpts a bit taxing.

We first encounter Holmes when he's introduced to Watson through a friend. Despite repeated attempts from said friend to warn Watson of the peculiarities of his new acquaintance, Watson decides that the financial benefits outweigh any weirdness on Holmes's part, and in he moves. Friend disappears. Watson is then swept into the whirlwind that is Holmes's life. He indicates the numerous visitors of all different backgrounds, the fact that Holmes practically never takes a moment to relax (except for the moments when he lounges on the couch and stares at the wall for hours), and that Holmes can literally deduce practically anything about an individual within the first 60 seconds of interaction. When Watson, a wounded ex-soldier and doctor, decides to accompany Holmes on his newest case, he's blown away by his ability to pull together the events of the case faster than any member of Scotland Yard.

The crime was put together pretty well. Motive and details were consistent and plausible in the crime-novel sense. However, I can't note particular inconsistencies or flaws at the moment; although, I did notice them while reading. I would have to say that my biggest issue with the novel was the sudden jump from the then present situation with the case to the back story of the murderer. The move from Victorian London to the unruly expanse of the Wild West atmosphere of Utah is completely unexpected and clumsily included. Moreover, it's clear that Doyle opposed the Mormons because he certainly doesn't portray them in a positive light once we do finally understand where he's going. While I won't divulge what does occur in the scenes that build the murderer's motive, I will admit that this section was far more interesting than reading Watson's internal dialogue and watching Holmes flit around like a school boy.

I won't say I was incredibly impressed with this one. I've heard that this isn't the best of the series, so I won't swear them off forever. It was clever, but I just never felt really engaged. It took my nearly two weeks to complete despite the fact that it's a mere 150 pages (with illustrations)! If you enjoy smart crime novels that just happen to be classics, I'd say give it a go. I'd also encourage you to do so if you enjoyed the recent BBC series, because I thought it was a great adaptation and enjoyed comparing the two.

3 of 50 completed for the Classics Club



10 comments:

  1. Definitely don't swear them off forever! The Sign of Four is fantastic. Try that one next, it's way better than this one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Melissa,
    I've also heard that The Hounds of Baskervilles is another good one. I won't swear them off but may wait a while to read another!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also haven't experienced Sherlock in the literary form, which I need to remedy. I did enjoy the BBC series, though, so I'll definitely pick up the books, but might skip this one to start with? The introduction of Holmes and Watson in the series was pretty funny, though :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, from what I've gathered from the blogging community, this isn't the best. However, this does set up Holmes and Watson's friendship and introduces you to everyone. However, the Sherlock series would do that too! Let me know if you decide to read one soon.

      Delete
  4. I haven' read Doyle yet either but I borrowed my sister's Sherlock Holmes anthology. So now it's just deciding where to begin! Maybe I can read a few to hold me over until BBC Sherlock starts up again...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lindsey,
      I'd love to see what you think when you do get to this one. I think I'm really in the minority on this one. I need to watch the rest of the Sherlock series because I actually only finished the first episode! I thought it did a great job of conveying the relationship in modern times.

      Delete
  5. I was pleased to read this review as I've been thinking I'm the only one who doesn't fully appreciate Sherlock Holmes/Doyle! I've tried a few of his books but they just don't work for me.

    I do love the cover of the edition you read though!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sam! Thank you! Haha. I think I probably will end up saying the same. I may try one more just because people have stated again and again that others are so much better. We shall see...

      Delete
  6. This book has been sitting unread on my shelf for a while now and perhaps I'll leave it there for a while longer! The Hound of the Baskervilles though is brilliant, as are some of the shorter adventures.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ellie,
      I'm thinking I should probably read that one. I've heard so many good things and actually intended on reading it first. I settled on this one because I wanted to get the introduction of Watson and Sherlock. I'll let you know!

      Delete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...